In its November 2010 issue Real Estate Marketing (REM) published a guest column entitled "In Praise of Commissions." When I cooled down a little, I wrote a response, just published in the February issue, which is reproduced below, but one should first read the original article In Praise of Commissions for context. Apologies for the length, but I'm competing with Paula Bean for the record!
Another View of Commission (as published in REM, February 2011)
The Guest Column (REM November 2010) did our industry a service by raising the subject of agent remuneration, but the assertion that sale-contingent commission is the best compensation method for ever and all time perhaps deserves some scrutiny.
Public response to on-line media articles around the recent Consent Agreement between CREA and Competition Bureau overwhelmingly cast real estate agents in a negative light, suggesting, among other things, that we are overpaid, under-qualified, self-serving, lazy etc. Little was said to suggest that we add much value to real estate transactions. A common thread connecting many of the negative comments was commission. Public opinion surveys repeatedly rank us embarrassingly low on the integrity scale. Our traditional compensation model only perpetuates this industry’s self-centric image in a day when consumers are demanding fairness and transparency.